Legal Opinion

Forsham v. Harris

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1980No. 78-1118PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnqtjist

The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U. S. C. § 552, empowers federal courts to order an “agency”, to produce “agency records improperly withheld” from an individual requesting access. § 552 (a)(4)(B). We hold here that written data generated, owned, and possessed by a privately controlled organization receiving federal study grants aré not “agency records” within the meaning of the Act when copies of those data have not been obtained by a federal agency subject to the FOIA. Federal participation in the generation of the data by means of a grant from the Department of Health, Education, and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Robert F. Bradley v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. Peter H. Forsham v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Burch v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API