Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Salomon
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 1982PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
Neither the failure to obtain permission from the court which appointed a receiver in mortgage foreclosure to begin an action against him for personal injury incurred by plaintiff during his receivership, nor the fact that prior to service of the summons and complaint the receiver had been permitted to resign subject to an accounting and application for discharge being made by him and a substitute receiver appointed, constitutes a jurisdictional defect barring maintenance of the action. The order of the Appellate Division should, therefore, be reversed, with…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Carrick v. Central General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Chautauque County Bank v. . RisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Pritchard v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In Re Euro-American Lodging Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- De Ronda v. Greater Amsterdam School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Vitug v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.