Legal Opinion
Hax v. Caspar
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
Decided May 6, 1887No. 2,086PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Bill to Set Aside Decree, etc.
1Opinion of the Court
Brewer, J.,
(orally.) In case 2,086 there is a motion to remand which presents something of an interesting question. Tho facts are these: There are three plaintiffs and throe defendants. One of the defendants, who seeks the removal, is a citizen of the state of Wisconsin. The other defendants, and one or two of the plaintiffs, are citizens of (adorado. This defendant seeks a removal on the ground of a separable controversy between himself and plaintiffs. One of the defendants, Catherine Caspar, executed some notes and a mortgage on real estate in this city to tho plaintiffs. A suit was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barney v. LathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Fidelity Insurance v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- PUTNAM & Another v. INGRAHAMSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sweeney v. Grand Island & W. C. R.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1894
- Ross v. Erie R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1902
- Adams v. TolertonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1927
- Smith v. Camas Prarie Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1914
- Brown v. HouseDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.