Legal Opinion

Brown v. House

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided March 3, 1927No. 1217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

On petition of defendant, based on diversity of citizenship, the state court ordered the eause removed to the federal court. After removal, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the case on two grounds: That the petition for removal was not presented to the state court, and no order authorizing such removal was made; that this court is without jurisdiction to determine the cause, for the reason that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and eosts, does not exceed $3,000. The transcript of the proceedings contains an order of removal made by the state court.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hax v. CasparU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berlin v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937
  2. Stuart v. CreelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Crockett v. OverfieldDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API