Smith v. Camas Prarie Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Idaho
At Law. Action by Elizabeth Smith as administratrix of the Estate of Charles H. Smith, deceased, against the Camas Prarie Railway Company. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
The action was brought by the plaintiff as administratrix to recover damages from the defendant railroad company for the death of Charles II. Smith, who was run over and *800■killed by one of the defendant’s trains at Lewiston, Idaho, on the 17th day of November, 1913. Upon petition of the defendant, it was brought here from the state district court, where it was originally commenced, and the plaintiff now moves that it be remanded. Defendant concedes that if it is a case arising under the federal Employers’ Liability Act of 1908, as amended, it should be remanded.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Fritzlen v. Boatmen's BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morgan Yawn, Jr. v. Southern Railway Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Frazier v. HinesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1919
- Mrs. Ruby L. Porter, Administratrix of the Estate of James A. Porter, Deceased v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- City of Montgomery v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1914