Legal Opinion

Adams v. Tolerton

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1927No. 500PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNAMER, District Judge.

This is a personal injury action, commenced jointly against the defendants Tolerton and the city of Tulsa, to recover for injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff when she stepped into an excavation in front of the defendant Tolerton’s property on the parking between the sidewalk and the street in the city of Tulsa. The excavation was made by the defendant city in grading the street according to the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition.

Tolorton removed the case to this court as a citizen of Missouri, upon the ground that there is a separable…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chi., RI & Pac. Ry. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Cummings v. HenningerArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Newport v. SchmitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Hancock v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Gilmore v. United Air Lines Transport Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1937
  4. Judd v. Oregon Short Line R.District Court, D. Idaho · 1933
  5. May v. George A. Rheman Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API