Legal Opinion

Ross v. Erie R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

Decided November 7, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings this action on account of the death of his son, killed by the defendants’ alleged wrongful act. The Erie Railroad Company is organized under the laws of New York, and the Pennsylvania Coal Company is created by the-laws of Pennsylvania. The complaint alleges that “both said defendants have a general office for the regular transaction of business at No. 21 Cortlandt street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, state of New York, having the same corps of officers, to wit,, the president, secretary, and treasurer,” and, upon information and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Case of the Sewing MacHine CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Vannevar v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rea v. Standard Mirror Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Dishon v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. Kelly v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1903
  4. Bradshaw v. BowdenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OlssonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API