Legal Opinion · Dissent

Evans Fuel Co. v. Leyda

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 1925No. 10,874Published

1DissentJustice Denison

I am compelled to dissent from the majority opinion.

Edythe E. Leyda had a verdict and judgment for damages against the plaintiffs in error for causing her land to sink by mining coal under it.

The facts were that Leyda purchased the premises from *364Mary Clark Steele and others by deed purporting to convey the fee upon the following qualifications: “Provided always, and these presents are upon the express condition that all coal, gas, oil or all other valuable mineral deposits in or under said premises already, or which may hereafter be found are reserved to, and excepted by the first parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Barker v. MintzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Burt v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Heistand v. BatemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API