Legal Opinion

Heistand v. Bateman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1907No. 5171; No. 2774 C. APublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County. Eon. Louis W. Cunningham, Judge. Action by G. E. Bateman against J. G. Heistand. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in an action brought by appellee, as plaintiff, to recover from appellant, as defendant, commissions to -which plaintiff claimed he was entitled, by reason of a sale of a case of specimens by defendant to a person brought to the store of defendant by plaintiff. The proximate amount of such sale was $4,500.

Plaintiff was a hack-driver and conveyed the purchaser to the store of the defendant. He bases his right to a commission of ten per cent, of the amount of the sale upon two grounds: First — On

the general custom,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savage v. PeltonColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Leach v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans Fuel Co. v. LeydaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Zimbelman v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. Alden Sign Co. v. RobleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. Evans Fuel Co. v. LeydaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Evans Fuel Co. v. LeydaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API