Barker v. Mintz
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Jennie Mintz obtained a permanent injunction against Wright Barker, restraining him from stripping the earth from above a vein of coal on certain land of which she owned the surface and he the coal. He brings error. The essential facts are these: The Union Pacific Land Company conveyed the land in question, “Excepting and reserving, 1st, All oil, coal and other minerals within and underlying said lands:
*2642nd, The exclusive right to prospect in and upon said lands for oil, coal and other minerals therein or which may be supposed to be therein and to mine for and remove from said lands all oil,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brande v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Berkey v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Campbell v. Louisville Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Chapin v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
- Burt v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- West Virginia - Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. StrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
- Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Rocky Mountain Fuel Company v. HeflinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.