Legal Opinion

Smithwick v. Young

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 9, 1981No. 80-290-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNER, Judge.

(Filed with concurrence of participating judges)

This is a dispute over a real estate commission. The chancellor in a bench trial awarded some, but not all of the claimed amount. The sellers of the property and the agent were dissatisfied with the ruling and both have appealed.

The caption in this cause is confusing as the owners of the property were initially involved in partition dispute in which appellant Sam N. Young, intervened as a third-party plaintiff seeking his commission. He will hereafter be referred to by name or as the plaintiff. The people with whom he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. YarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hammond v. Herbert Hood Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Johnson v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Loventhal v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Third National Bank in Nashville v. CottenTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James Sigmon v. Appalachian Coal PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Parks v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Seay v. County of ShelbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Delores M. King v. Tennessee Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API