Cheatham v. Yarbrough
Tennessee Supreme Court
EKOM DAVIDSON. Appeal iii error from tlie Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. McAlister, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Caldwell,' J.
This action was brought by Yar-brough, Maddux & Davis, real estate agents, to recover from ~W. B. Cheatham certain commissions alleged to be due them for services rendered him with respect to a sale of real estate. He defended and resisted a recovery on the ground that the sale was never in fact completed.
The Circuit Judge, trying the case without the intervention of a jury, held that the plaintiffs had done all that the law required' them to do as agents, and gave judgment in their favor for $205 and costs.
Defendant appealed in error.
Cheatham placed certain real estate in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schwartze v. YearlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Gonzales v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Fraser v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Billington v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- Hammond v. Herbert Hood Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Siler v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Tracy v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.