Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Herbert Hood Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided December 17, 1948PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALDROP, S. J.
This suit was instituted in the Chancery Court of Shelby County by Herbert Hood, Sr., and Herbert Hood, Jr., composing a partnership, engaged as real estate- brokers or agents under the firm name of Herbert Hood Company, against defendants, James Thomas Hammond and wife, Beatrice R. Hammand, for a real estate commission alleged to have been lawfully earned by complainants by reason of services performed by them incident to the sale of certain real property of defendant, Mrs. Beatrice R. Hammond, same being a highly developed acreage in Shelby County and known as: “Mimosa.” The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Canton Cotton Mills v. Bowman Overall Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Carpenter v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Cheatham v. YarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Siler v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rural Educational Association v. BushCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
- Rich Printing Company v. McKellar's EstateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Klosterman Development Corp. v. Outlaw Aircraft Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Holt v. American Progressive Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Billington v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.