Legal Opinion
Seay v. County of Shelby
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 31, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOMLIN, Judge.
The defendants in these two cases have appealed from an adverse judgment against them and rendered in favor of certain bondholders by the Honorable William H. Inman, Chancellor, sitting as Special Judge by designation. The two cases were tried together by consent. The first case originated as an appeal by the plaintiff J. Irby Seay, d/b/a Irby Seay Company, from an order or judgment of the Shelby County Quarterly Court which resulted in the consolidation and merger of the Cloverhaven Utility District into Shelby County.
The second case was a class action brought by the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. SchraderTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Sutton v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Smithwick v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Pitts & Co. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jaffe v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- City of Lavergne v. Southern Silver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Southland Express, Inc. v. Scrap Metal Buyers of Tampa, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Condominium Management Ass., Inc. v. Fairway Village Owner's Ass., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- Kennedy Woods v. Nashville and Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003