Legal Opinion

ORAVECZ v. New York Life Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2009No. B206066Published

1Opinion of the Court

174 Cal.App.4th 1114 (2009)

PAUL ORAVECZ, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. B206066.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

May 11, 2009.

Paul Oravecz, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Barger & Wolen, Robert J. McKennon and Robert E. Hess for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WEISBERG, J.[*]—

SUMMARY

When he learned his investments in "Tradex," an offshore foreign currency trading fund, were worthless, Paul Oravecz sued Steve Roth and Roth's alleged employer, respondents New York Life Insurance Company…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API