Legal Opinion

People v. Oppenheimer

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1909No. Crim. No. 1493PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The defendant was informed against for committing an assault with a deadly weapon, with malice aforethought, while undergoing a life sentence in the California state prison at San Quentin, upon the person of one J. Wilson, a human being, being the crime defined by section 246 of the Penal Code, enacted in the year 1901. He was found guilty of the offense charged and adjudged to suffer death, as the section requires in such cases. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, and also from an order denying his motion to suspend judgment on the ground that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API