Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gipple

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1992No. Nos. 694 and 695PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether the imposition of mandatory fines in 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508 violates Article I, Section 13 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We find that it does not and affirm.

The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows. On March 29, 1990, the Huntingdon Borough Police conducted a sting operation. The police observed the appellant, David Gipple, in the middle of a drug transaction that involved 3.45 grams of cocaine. Later that evening, the Attorney General’s Drug Task Force conducted a search of the appellant’s home.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. MASTRANGELO v. BUCKLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Hiko Energy, LLC v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. HeggenstallerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Com. v. Dinardo, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API