Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Omaha Bridge Commission

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1934No. 29144PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This suit was instituted by Charles B. Kirby and Elizabeth J. Lindsey, resident taxpayers of the city of Omaha, *383against the city of Omaha and certain individuals named who are members of the city council thereof, -Roy. N. Towl as mayor thereof and ex officio member of the Omaha bridge commission, the Omaha bridge commission, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue, of chapter 14, art. 12, Comp. St. 1929, and the individuals named as members constituting the same, as in the amended petition set forth. So far as we are concerned with this pleading on appeal, we are confined to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beck v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance FundNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schroder v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Martin v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API