Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The corporation provided for by the act is not a private corporation, but a public institution. The Legislature had power to create same. White v. Ala. Insane Hospital, 138 Ala. 479,35 So. 454; Trustees v. Winston, 5 Stew. P. 17; Wolf v. Underwood, 91 Ala. 523, 8 So. 774; 12 C. J. 1031; 14 C. J. 72; State v. Board of Regents of U. of Kansas, 55 Kan. 389, 40 P. 656, 29 L.R.A. 378. Sections 104 (6) (20) and 229 of the Constitution apply to private corporations. City of Ensley v. Simpson,166 Ala. 366, 52 So. 61; Ex parte City Council, 64 Ala. 467. The act deals with the organization of an…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
- Alford v. State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- City of Ensley v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Beeland Wholesale Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.