Legal Opinion

People v. Robinson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2016No. S220247PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

It is a commonly stated rule that if the statutory elements of a crime include the elements of another offense, so that the first offense cannot be committed without also committing the second, the second is a “lesser offense” that is “necessarily included” in the first. (E.g., People v. Bailey (2012) 54 Cal.4th 740, 748 [143 Cal.Rptr.3d 647, 279 P.3d 1120] (Bailey).) As this case demonstrates, however, when the same evidence is required to support all the elements of both offenses, there is no lesser included offense.

The issue here is whether misdemeanor sexual battery is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. LohbauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. Jonathan R.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. FontenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. Munoz, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. Macias, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. Alvarez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API