Legal Opinion

People v. Macias

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 31, 2018No. A151198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, Acting P.J.

A jury found defendant guilty of using a minor for purposes of posing for sexual conduct. Defendant claims the trial court prejudicially erred by failing to instruct the jury sua sponte on the lesser uncharged offense of unauthorized invasion of privacy. We conclude the trial court had no duty to instruct on unauthorized invasion of privacy because it is not a lesser included offense of using a minor for purposes of posing for sexual conduct under the elements test or the accusatory pleading test. We, therefore, affirm the judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Raquel C. and defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. LohbauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. Munoz, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. Alvarez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. People v. Badio CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Gomez CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API