Legal Opinion

Hassett v. Dixie Furniture Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1991No. 9122SC15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred by denying his motion to amend the complaint adding a party *688defendant. Plaintiff contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend, thereby preventing plaintiff from presenting all claims he had against the corporate defendant and wrongfully affording the president of the corporation a permanent exemption from all liability arising from his wrongful conduct.

Plaintiff filed his complaint for breach of contract on 28 December 1988. On 31 October 1989 plaintiffs counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Pressman v. University of North Carolina at CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Plymouth Pallet Co., Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Winston-Salem v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API