City of Winston-Salem v. Yarbrough
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Plaintiff’s Appeal
Plaintiff brings forward four assignments of error and four arguments in support thereof. Each of plaintiff’s arguments concerns the trial court’s determination that defendants’ parcels should be treated as one tract for purposes of compensation. We find no merit in plaintiff’s arguments.
Municipalities such as plaintiff are empowered to condemn property for, among other things, the opening of roads. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 40A-3 (1984). This power is subject, of course, to the requirement that the municipality provide just compensation to the owner of the property…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Airlie Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Taylor v. AbernethyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Womack Newspapers, Inc. v. Town of Kitty Hawk Ex Rel. Kitty Hawk Town CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Department of Transportation v. Nelson Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Town of Midland v. WayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.