Legal Opinion

Valerio v. Valerio

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 2008No. 071499; A136670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Respondent appeals a stalking protective order (SPO), arguing that the evidence supplied by petitioner is legally insufficient. On de novo review, Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 537, 953 P2d 1130 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 418 (1999), we agree and reverse.

Petitioner was bom in Honduras and, until 2004, she lived there. In 2004, her father and respondent, his wife (and petitioner’s stepmother), helped petitioner immigrate to this country. When petitioner arrived in this country, she moved in with her father and respondent in Albany and remained there for the next two years. During that time,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wayt v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D. O. v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. T. M. E. v. StropeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API