Legal Opinion

D. O. v. Richey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 2019No. A166855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

18 Argued and submitted August 1, reversed December 4, 2019 D. O., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Eli Franklyn RICHEY, Respondent-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 17SK02618; A166855

456 P3d 348

Respondent, a self-identified citizen journalist and police watchdog, appeals a judgment and stalking protective order (SPO) prohibiting contact with petitioner, a police chief. He contests the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the SPO, arguing that the SPO erroneously relied on constitutionally-protected speech, and that petitioner failed to prove that her alarm was objectively reasonable.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Phillip Turner v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Glik v. CunniffeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Richard Fields v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. L. P. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. T. M. E. v. StropeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. M. D. O. v. DesantisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. I. R. S. v. HaningtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API