Legal Opinion

Wayt v. Goff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. C950958CV; CA A91152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Tracy Goff appeals the trial court’s issuance of a permanent Stalking Protective Order (SPO) designed to prevent him from contacting Gaiy Wayt or Wayt’s family. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), 1 and reverse.

The undisputed facts are as follows. Wayt is a Tigard Police Officer. He and Goff have known each other for a number of years. Wayt filed a uniform stalking complaint against Goff on August 31,1995. In the complaint, Wayt alleged that Goff had been harassing him for 11 years, had threatened his fife in 1993 and, more recently, had been to Wayt’s neighborhood where he was seen looking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Delgado v. SoudersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. Norris-RomineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. RangelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valerio v. ValerioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. DompelingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API