In Re Disciplinary Action Against Plummer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent, William A. Plummer, alleging that Plum-mer (1) failed to attend an administrative hearing, failed to communicate with his client in the matter, and failed to return the client’s file; (2) failed to notify his client and a tribunal of his suspension; and (3) failed to cooperate with the Director’s investigation of his misconduct. Plummer failed to answer the petition, the allegations are deemed admitted, and the only issue we now consider is the appropriate…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against VaughtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against KinnunenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MuenchrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Matter of Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KarlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.