Descoteaux v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The plaintiffs petitioned for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of the extent of insurance coverage under two separate family automobile policies issued by the defendant. The Trial Court (Wyman, J.) transferred the following questions of law to this court without ruling, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 9:
“A. Whether an ‘insured’ under two separate policies of automobile insurance is barred from recovering the aggregate amount of medical payments benefits available under both policies solely because they were written by the same carrier.
B. Whether an ‘insured’ under two separate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Town of Epping v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Vigneault v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Carrignan v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Courtemanche v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.