Legal Opinion

Roy v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 2006No. CR 06-652PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Dallas Roy, through his attorney John May, filed a motion for rule on clerk to file his record and have his appeal docketed. The clerk refused to docket the appeal based on a failure to comply with Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Civil 5(b)(1), regarding an extension of time to file the record.

Attorney John May represented appellant below. The court entered an amended judgment and commitment order on November 3, 2005. The next day, Mr. May filed a motion to be relieved as attorney of record, but no order granting the motion or substituting counsel appears in the record. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Rackley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Samontry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Bond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API