Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 2007No. CR 07-357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Kenneth Harrison, by and through his attorney, Bill Luppen, has filed a motion for belated appeal. The clerk refused to accept the record because it was untimely. Counsel concedes in his motion for belated appeal before this court that he did not give all parties an opportunity to be heard on Harrison’s motion to extend the time for filing the transcript under Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5(b)(1)(C). The record thus reflects that counsel did not strictly comply with Rule 5.

We have held that Rule 5(b)(1) applies to both civil and criminal cases for the determination of the timeliness of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Rackley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byrer v. ColvardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Spurlock v. RiddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. GRIDDINE v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Horvath v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API