Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Carter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 2008No. 07-1284PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Sarah Lancaster, by and through her attorney, Steven Jackson, has filed a motion for rule on clerk to file her record and have his appeal docketed. The clerk refused to accept the record. The record before us does not show strict compliance with Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure - Rule 5(b)(1)(C), as all parties have not had an opportunity to be heard on appellant’s motions to extend time for filing the transcript.

We have held that Rule 5(b)(1) applies to both civil and criminal cases for the determination of the timeliness of a record on appeal. See Roy v. State, 367 Ark. 178,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Rackley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Charles R. Griffith Farms, Inc. v. GraumanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Wyre v. WyreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Byrer v. ColvardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Spurlock v. RiddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. J.D.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API