Legal Opinion

Bond v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 13, 2008No. CR 08-224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Harvey Bond, Jr., by and through his attorney, Phillip A. McGough, has filed a motion for rule on clerk to file his record and have his appeal docketed. The clerk refused to accept the record. The record before us does not show strict compliance with Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 5(b)(1)(C), as all parties have not had an opportunity to be heard on appellant’s motions to extend time for filing the transcript.

We have held that Rule 5(b)(1) applies to both civil and criminal cases for the determination of the timeliness of a record on appeal. See Roy v. State, 367 Ark. 178, 238 S.W.3d 117…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Rackley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. McGahey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Reid v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. GRIDDINE v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API