Legal Opinion

Rackley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 27, 2006No. CR 06-385PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Marcus Lance Racidey filed a motion for rule on the clerk to file his record and have his appeal docketed. The clerk refused to docket the appeal based on a failure to comply with Ark. R. App. P.&emdash; 5(b). Rule 5(b) concerns the extension of time within which to file the record and provides:(1) If any party has designated stenographically reported material for inclusion in the record on appeal, the circuit court, by order entered before expiration of the period prescribed by subdivision (a) of this rule or a prior extension order, may extend the time for filing the record only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petras v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Lancaster v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. McGahey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Bond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API