Legal Opinion

Jamaal Johnson v. Burl Cain, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2013No. 11-31121PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

Federal habeas petitioner Jamaal R. Johnson argues on appeal that his trial attorney interfered with his federal constitutional right to testify at his state trial for armed robbery and felon in possession of a firearm. Because Johnson disclaimed that argument during state habeas proceedings, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of his § 2254 petition as unexhausted.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Johnson was found guilty after a jury trial in Louisiana court of three counts of armed robbery and one count of felon in possession of a firearm. He was sentenced as a habitual…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MarzettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Williams v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  3. Acosta Hernandez v. BroholmDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  4. Carr v. CainDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022
  5. Carr v. CainDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API