Legal Opinion

Carr v. Cain

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided December 6, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00274Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION ANTHONY CARR PETITIONER V. NO. 3:19-CV-274-DMB NATHAN CAIN, Mississippi Corrections Commissioner; and LYNN FITCH, Attorney General RESPONDENTS OPINION AND ORDER Anthony Carr moves to stay and hold in abeyance his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on grounds that his petition contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Because one of Carr’s claims satisfies the Rhines standard but the remaining ones do not, Carr will be allowed the opportunity to pursue relief in state court regarding such claim…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API