Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City of New London, No. 541273 (Feb. 24, 2000)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 24, 2000No. 541273UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR REARGUMENT
The plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration and reargument on the court's ruling granting the defendant City's motion for summary judgment., The defendant City has filed an objection on several grounds. The court will grant the objection based on the fact that the motion to reargue was not filed in a timely manner. In this case, the court granted summary judgment as to all seven counts of the plaintiff's…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- New Haven Redevelopment Agency v. Research Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- K. A. Thompson Electric Co. v. Wesco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Russell v. Thomas O'connor & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- In Re Karen R.Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lipka v. Madoule, No. Cv99-0428311s (Dec. 17, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001