Lipka v. Madoule, No. Cv99-0428311s (Dec. 17, 2001)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION (MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT)
Pursuant to Practice Book § 17-44 et seq., the defendants, Madoule, DeLuise and North Branford have filed a motion for summary judgment regarding the First and Second Counts of the plaintiff's complaint dated June 29, 1999, bearing a return date of August 3, 1999. The defendants claim that said action is barred by the doctrine of governmental immunity and that the claim against the defendant North Branford pursuant to General Statutes § 7-465, is derivative to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.