In Re Karen R.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
The issue before the court is whether the time within which to bring an appeal may be extended by the filing of a motion to open a judgment, filed after the expiration of the appeal period.
On December 2, 1997, this court issued a decision terminating the parental rights of the biological parents of Karen R. Pursuant to Practice Book § 4009 (a), the appeal period expired on December 22, 1997. On January 8, 1998, the respondent mother, Carmen M. R. (respondent), filed a “motion to Re-open Judgment,” 1 that was denied by this court, ex parte, on January 9, 1998.
On January 13,1998, twenty-two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Altberg v. Paul Kovacs Tire Shop, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Stephen v. HoerleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Daland's ApplicationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. City of New London, No. 541273 (Feb. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000