Legal Opinion

In Re Karen R.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 17, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The issue before the court is whether the time within which to bring an appeal may be extended by the filing of a motion to open a judgment, filed after the expiration of the appeal period.

On December 2, 1997, this court issued a decision terminating the parental rights of the biological parents of Karen R. Pursuant to Practice Book § 4009 (a), the appeal period expired on December 22, 1997. On January 8, 1998, the respondent mother, Carmen M. R. (respondent), filed a “motion to Re-open Judgment,” 1 that was denied by this court, ex parte, on January 9, 1998.

On January 13,1998, twenty-two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Altberg v. Paul Kovacs Tire Shop, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Stephen v. HoerleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Daland's ApplicationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. City of New London, No. 541273 (Feb. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API