Legal Opinion
K. A. Thompson Electric Co. v. Wesco, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 4, 1991No. 9927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The dispositive issue of this motion to dismiss the appeal is whether the timely filing of a motion to reargue tolls the running of the appeal period. We conclude that it does.
The facts are not in dispute. This is a breach of contract action in which judgment was rendered for the defendant on January 3, 1991. On the following day, the plaintiff filed a motion to reargue, which was heard and subsequently denied on January 22, 1991. On February 4, 1991, more than twenty days after final judgment, the plaintiff filed the present appeal. On February 8,1991, the defendant filed a timely motion *759to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Springfield-Dewitt Gardens, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Crozier v. ZabooriConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Whitney Frocks, Inc. v. JaffeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Anderson v. City of New London, No. 541273 (Feb. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Connecticut National Bank v. Investors Capital Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Mechanics Farmers Sav. v. Largo Danbury, No. 30 55 63 (Apr. 11, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Petersen v. Petersen, No. Fa 95 547879 (Sep. 19, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997