Legal Opinion
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 9, 1947No. 970PublishedCited by 741 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Our concern here is with the intervention rights of representatives of railroad employees in a suit brought against the railroad under §16 (12) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U. S. C. § 16 (12).
The origin of this suit is to be found in an order issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission on May 16,1922. Chicago Junction Case, 71 I. C. C. 631. See also Chicago Junction Case, 264 U. S. 258. The Commission there approved the purchase by the New York Central Railroad Co. (Central) of all the capital stock of the Chicago River & Indiana Railroad Co. (River Road); it also authorized the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Cornell v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by741 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
736 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.