Legal Opinion

Jay v. Ireland & Matthews Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 30, 1922No. 395PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Webb Jay and the Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation against the Ireland & Matthews Manufacturing Company. Decree for complainants.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

The bill in this case charges infringement by the defendant, Ireland & Matthews Manufacturing Company, of United States letters patent, No. 1,132,273, granted to the plaintiff Webb Jay, March 16, 1915; the coplaintiff, Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation, being exclusive licensee under said patent. The article of commerce involved, is a vacuum tank used for feeding gasoline to the carbureter of an automobile engine.

This case having come on to be heard upon the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, and -the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and the parties…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Hoyt v. HorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Munising Paper Co. v. American Sulphite Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Allen Matthews v. Koolvent Metal Awning Co. Of Winston-Salem, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  2. Jay v. SuetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Walker v. Lakewood Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
  4. R. C. Mahon Co. v. Newcomb-David Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API