Legal Opinion
Jay v. Suetter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1929No. 5780PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs below, Webb Jay and Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation, are respectively the owner of and exclusive licensee under patent No. 1,132,273, granted to Jay March 16, 1915. The patent is for what is commonly known as a vacuum tank fuel feed for automobiles. The complaint alleges infringement thereof, particularly of claims 9 and 14, by the defendants, in their manufacture and sale of what is referred to as the Simplex vacuum feed covered by patent No. 1,662,282, issued March 13, 1928. Prom an interlocutory decree adjudging the validity of plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hoyt v. HorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co. v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sperry Products, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- Creagmile v. John Bean Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1940