Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Horne

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1892No. 336PublishedCited by 75 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ' MASSACHUSETTS. The court stated the case as follows : This was a bill in equity for the infringement of letters •patent No. 303,374, issued August 12, 1884, to John Hoyt, for a rag engine for paper making. “This invention,” said the patentee in his specification, “relates to engines for beating rags, and similar fibrous material into pulp for the manufacture of paper.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ' MASSACHUSETTS. The court stated the case as follows : This was a bill in equity for the infringement of letters •patent No. 303,374, issued August 12, 1884, to John Hoyt, for a rag engine for paper making. “This invention,” said the patentee in his specification, “relates to engines for beating rags, and similar fibrous material into pulp for the manufacture of paper. In these machines a beater-roll set with kni\ js •around its periphery is used, in combination with a bed-plate also set with knives, the said parts being…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

The engine in ordinary use by paper makers for the reduction of rags to pulp prior to the invention in question consisted of . a tub about fourteen feet in length with straight sides and semicircular ends. Through the centre of this ran ■'a vertical partition called the mid-feather, extending lengthwise of the tub, and with sufficient room between the ends of the partition, and the ends of the tub to allow the pulp to pass around from one side of the tub to the other; Midway of the tub and between the mid-feather and one side was a wheel or beater-roll, armed with knives, placed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Lighting World, Inc. v. Birchwood Lighting, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API