Legal Opinion

R. C. Mahon Co. v. Newcomb-David Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 28, 1931No. 3347Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, District Judge.

There are in issue both the validity and infringement of the patent to Russell. C. Mahon, No. 1,641,181 for a pneumatic conveyer. The patent describes a conveyer system in which a main conduit of uniform diameter throughout is utilized, into which branch conduits or pipes may discharge without permitting the material to accumulate in the bottom of the conveyer conduit. In the prior art it was the practice, when branch conduits wore required, to reduce the sections of the conveyer conduit in proportion to the distance of the section from the suction or exhaust fan so as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farrington v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  2. Byerley v. Sun Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Jay v. Ireland & Matthews Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  4. Henney v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  5. Ottinger v. Ferro Stamping & Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API