Legal Opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Microtron Corporation
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided May 24, 1966No. Civ. 2042PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
CRAVEN, Chief Judge.
In this suit for patent infringement brought by Union Carbide Corporation against Microtron Corporation, Micro-tron counters with a motion for summary judgment on the ground that within six months of the date on which application for the patent was filed in the United States Patent Office an application was also filed in Canada without a license as required by Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 184. Such unlicensed foreign filing, Microtron contends, renders the patent invalid as a matter of law under Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 185. On February 28, 1966, after the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCulloch Motors Corp. v. Oregon Saw Chain Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. And Harold A. Frediani v. Coleman Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Norton CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
- Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Blake v. Bassick CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, and Hadco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- In re GaertnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Microtron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967