Legal Opinion
Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 9, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, District Judge.
In November 1960, plaintiff, The Barr Rubber Products Company (“Barr”), brought an action seeking a declaration that a patent owned by defendant, The Sun Rubber Company (“Sun”), is invalid. The patent in question is United States Molitor patent No. 2,629,134 (“the Molitor patent”). In its complaint and counterclaim, Barr also alleges unfair competition and antitrust violations for which it seeks damages and injunctive relief. 1 In two counterclaims, Sun asks for a declaration that its patent is valid and has been infringed and seeks equitable relief and damages for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- General Radio Co. v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Norton CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, and Hadco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Microtron CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Guan v. MayorkasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.