Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Norton Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 29, 1965No. 37154PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNELL, Chief Judge.
The history of this patent begins on February 21, 1957, when the plaintiff filed in the United States Patent Office an application which became Serial No. 641714. On October 8, 1958, the plaintiff filed an application for patent in the names of its employees Howard L. Hoover, Eugene J. Dupre and Walter J. Rankin, Application No. 777,167, which application contained matter related to a certain extent to the subject matter of the earlier application, but which contained certain substantial additional subject matter. In the month of January 1959, less than six months after…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co. v. AultmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. And Harold A. Frediani v. Coleman Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Cregier v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, and Hadco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Blake v. Bassick CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- Davidson Rubber Co. v. Sheller Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1965
- Pillsbury Company v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.