Legal Opinion

Blake v. Bassick Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 30, 1965No. 62 C 694PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBSON, District Judge.

The court heretofore on November 5, 1963, denied plaintiffs’ Patent No. 2,-704,663 was invalid due to their filing an application for a patent abroad prior to the expiration of six months from the filing of their application in the United States without a license from the Commissioner of Patents to do so, or that the United States patent was invalid because such a license did issue retroactively some eight years after the patent was issued.

In the interim, several decisions have been announced which bear upon this subject. They are the basis for the defendants’ April 29,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beckman Instruments, Inc. And Harold A. Frediani v. Coleman Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Norton CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Transitron Electronic Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft Company, Transitron Electronic Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, and Hadco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Davidson Rubber Co. v. Sheller Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1965
  5. Pillsbury Company v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API