Legal Opinion
Ramos v. Pacheco
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1944No. Civ. 14330PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Respondent instituted this action to enforce the rescission of a written contract executed by herself and appellant on November 18, 1940. Judgment was entered in her favor on findings favorable to respondent on all of the material issues. Appellant now attacks the judgment on the ground that the second count of the complaint is insufficient and that the findings are not supported.
On the 8th of March, 1934, while appellant was operating El Charo Grocery in the city of Los Angeles, and living with respondent as his wife he agreed by a writing with respondent that in consideration of her entire…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Aronowicz v. Nalley's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Thomas v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Auclair v. AuclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946