Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Roth v. Waterfield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 1933No. 24650PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This appeal is perfected from a decision of the district court of Tulsa county refusing to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the court clerk of that county to issue a summons in a mortgage foreclosure action.
The parties appear in this court in the order of their appearance in the trial court, and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.
The mortgage foreclosure action was filed in the district court of Tulsa county on April 27, 1933. Plaintiff’s petition was accompanied by a praecipe for summons requesting that the court clerk issue summons requiring the defendants to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.